考研阅读之推理题例题及相关讲解
导语：
推理题对于大多数的考研学生来讲，都是一个很难的题型。它有时候是可以定位的，但是对阅读理解力的要求会更高，因为大多数答案是要求有更深层的理解的，不仅仅要体会意思，而且还要有很好的排除干扰项的能力。
考研阅读考研阅读
推理题对于大多数的考研学生来讲，都是一个很难的题型。它有时候是可以定位的，但是对阅读理解力的要求会更高，因为大多数答案是要求有更深层的理解的，不仅仅要体会意思，而且还要有很好的排除干扰项的能力。
We are overloaded daily with new discoveries, patents and inventions all promising a better life, but that better life has not been forthcoming for most. Too many well-funded entrepreneurial efforts turn out to promise more than they can deliver or read as parody. When everything is characterized as “world-changing,” is anything ? The impulse to conflate those efforts with Nobel-Prize-worthy good works is not just a bit crazy, it is currently a wildfire burning through the so-called innovation sector. Products and services are designed to “disrupt” market sectors--bringing to market things no one really needs--more than to solve actual problems, especially those problems described as “the unexotic underclass”--single mothers, the white rural poor, veterans, out-of-work Americans over 50.
It is indicated in Paragraph 1 that many entrepreneurial efforts______.
A succeed in creating a better life
B effectively spur the innovation sector
C produce a disruptive influence on market
D cause more real problems for businesses
参考翻译：我们每天都被新发现、专利和发明所累，这些都预示着更好的生活，但对大多数人来说，更好的生活并没有到来。有太多资金充足的创业努力最终承诺的东西超出了它们的能力，或者被解读为拙劣的模仿。当一切都被描述为“改变世界”时，还有什么呢?把这些努力与诺贝尔奖的优秀作品混为一谈的冲动不仅有点疯狂，而且目前在所谓的创新领域就像一场野火在燃烧。产品和服务旨在“扰乱”市场部门——将没有人真正需要的东西推向市场——而不是解决实际问题，尤其是那些被称为“普通的下层阶级”的问题——单身母亲、农村贫困白人、退伍军人、50岁以上失业的美国人。
题目问的是： 很多企业家的努力 ________.
面对这道题，我们要先去定位到原文中有 entrepreneurial efforts的位置， 在解读这道题的时候，我们要把控一下作者的态度。 从开始的时候，就有个but , but that better life has not been forthcoming for most. 就算后面这句没有读懂 ，我们也能发现前面的句子是好的，所以后面应该是不好的内容。那么选择上首先可以排除 A B 。接下来就排除c D 就可以。
If the most fundamental definition of design is to solve problems, why are many people devoting so much energy to solving problems that don’t really exist? In “Design, The Invention of Desire” Jessica brings to light an amazing kernel: “hack”, a term so beloved in Silicon Valley that it is painted on the courtyard of the Facebook campus and is visible from planets flying overhead. To “hack” is to cut, to gash, to break. It proceeds form the belief that nothing worth saving, that everything needs fixing. But is that really the case? Are we fixing the right things?
It can be inferred that the effect of “hacking”in the passage is _____.
A harmful B desirable C far-reaching D questionable
版权声明：本原创文章版权归新通教育网所有，欢迎转载，请务必保持原文完整，并注明作者和出处“新通教育网（www.igo.cn）”。谢谢！
-
有疑问在线咨询老师
咨询时间:9:00-23:00
非咨询时间也可留言 -
400-618-0271
咨询时间:
9:00-23:00
定制备考方案
