GMAT写作之低分七宗罪

本文是新通外语小编为广大考生整理的GMAT写作之低分七宗罪，希望帮助大家解决GMAT考试难题，取得好的成绩。

考生们在准备GMAT考试的时候，经常会参考一些资料。这方面比较明显的就是GMAT作文了，作文考试大部分的考生是要参考模板的，但是这时候就会出现一个问题。考生们在考场上写的作文不少都让判卷人哭笑不得，很多还是比较低级的错误。

GMAT写作低分七宗罪（一）：无因果联系

The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.

GMAT写作低分七宗罪（二）：样本不足

The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.

GMAT写作低分七宗罪（三）：错误类比

The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....

GMAT写作低分七宗罪（四）：时地全等

The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....

GMAT写作低分七宗罪（五）：二者择一

The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.

GMAT写作低分七宗罪（六）：可疑调查

The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that...would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.

GMAT写作低分七宗罪（七）：结论无据

The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility

还有更多关于GMAT相关备考的内容请关注新通外语频道，我们将第一时间将最新的GMAT备考经验分享给大家，同时也希望在考生们利用GMAT复习的同时，注重学习方法的总结，考出理想的成绩。

天津培训机构众多，为何一定要选新通天津？

★ 金牌课程顾问：通晓各类留学考试，准确评估，量身定制培训课程。　　

★ 权威培训教师：实力派名师团队，名校海归及硕士占70%以上。

★ 专属教学督导：海归或英语专八的教师，贴心严格辅导学习生活。

★ 贴心留学服务：海归背景，熟悉各国留学、签证，一对一订制留学方案。

如有更多问题欢迎致电新通教育：400-618-0272，登录     

• 有疑问在线咨询老师

  咨询时间:9:00-23:00
  非咨询时间也可留言

• 400-618-0271

  咨询时间:
  9:00-23:00